I think you’ve answered your own question. They are nice perky and therefore they exhibit suboptimal hang. This not to say they are bad breasts. Just that they do not have optimal hang coefficient.
I'm looking at one of his prints right now on the wall behind my monitor. It shows a Bay Area model from the 1990s named Bambi who has special meaning for me - partly because she has the perfect hang factor. Ah, here is a link to the print:
Ah, so this begs the question, in which category would you place breasts that have been augmented? And are you working on a part 2? Unlike some in the peanut gallery, I actually read this article for the words.
I've never seen so many images and insights about breasts in one post, but I'm definitely not complaining! Thanks for sharing such an interesting perspective, I learned something new.
Funny, I totally agree with the gist of the post, but I found myself increasingly disappointed by it the more I read. And that's actually not a knock on your writing ability, which is obviously excellent. It's just that, for me, the hang is an ineffable quality. The beauty is diminished by articulation.
I am confident in my own preferred tastes to agree with the issues illuminated in the post as well as intrigued by the level of analysis applied to the personal preferences involved. It's also something that accompanies the personality of individual possessor of the body part. I am always eager to know more.
With all due humility, I have to say, I got a good hand in the breast department. And you're spot on with the theory of the hang!
I briefly dated a gorgeous and fascinating man, who seemed to exist somewhere on the spectrum. After he experienced my tits in person - he struck out on his own to explain the phenomenon! Lol
And he therefore introduced me to the golden ratio theory…
It came down to the ideal ratio being 45:55…45% upper half slope and 55% bottom have hang.
It still tickles me that he put in the time to do the research. And it's a funny little takeaway from a fleeting fling!
Love this article and will continue to follow and read!
I'm gonna be honest man it's a little hard to pay attention to the actual words you're saying in this article
What words?
There were words?
Words?
The article I wish I wrote
Beautiful work
Thank you
Explain why you think the one model has suboptimal hang. They look nice and perky to me. What am I missing?
> They look nice and perky to me.
I think you’ve answered your own question. They are nice perky and therefore they exhibit suboptimal hang. This not to say they are bad breasts. Just that they do not have optimal hang coefficient.
The classic teardrop C is perfect! Any balloonist alternative is simply gluttony!
Most Scholarly article I ever saw(I mean read).
Excellent article. As an erotic photographer who is pretty familiar with Craig Morey’s work, I commend your choice of illustrative photos.
Oh wow. Very cool that you know him. His work is incredibly beautiful, made my job easy. Thank you very much.
I'm looking at one of his prints right now on the wall behind my monitor. It shows a Bay Area model from the 1990s named Bambi who has special meaning for me - partly because she has the perfect hang factor. Ah, here is a link to the print:
https://www.ebay.com/itm/165367393292?_skw=bambi&itmmeta=01JSZ8AH2V57Q7DH6V4WR87A74&hash=item2680aa2c0c:g:qWUAAOSwQH9hHZVb
Exceptional hang. Rare breed, that particular type of nipple often impairs optimal hang. Not in Bambi though. Thanks for sharing.
I believe the most important characteristics of a breast are how much the owner of the breasts likes them licked, sucked, fondled, and fucked.
I'm going to guess you must really hate breast implants. The whole point of them is that they can be huge and still have no hang.
We're talking about breasts in this article.
Ah, so this begs the question, in which category would you place breasts that have been augmented? And are you working on a part 2? Unlike some in the peanut gallery, I actually read this article for the words.
epstein was murdered, the body made to appear self-hung
With a J or L coefficient?
I've never seen so many images and insights about breasts in one post, but I'm definitely not complaining! Thanks for sharing such an interesting perspective, I learned something new.
Anything over a mouthful is a waste just saying
Funny, I totally agree with the gist of the post, but I found myself increasingly disappointed by it the more I read. And that's actually not a knock on your writing ability, which is obviously excellent. It's just that, for me, the hang is an ineffable quality. The beauty is diminished by articulation.
I am confident in my own preferred tastes to agree with the issues illuminated in the post as well as intrigued by the level of analysis applied to the personal preferences involved. It's also something that accompanies the personality of individual possessor of the body part. I am always eager to know more.
No puffies?
With all due humility, I have to say, I got a good hand in the breast department. And you're spot on with the theory of the hang!
I briefly dated a gorgeous and fascinating man, who seemed to exist somewhere on the spectrum. After he experienced my tits in person - he struck out on his own to explain the phenomenon! Lol
And he therefore introduced me to the golden ratio theory…
It came down to the ideal ratio being 45:55…45% upper half slope and 55% bottom have hang.
It still tickles me that he put in the time to do the research. And it's a funny little takeaway from a fleeting fling!
Love this article and will continue to follow and read!