Good column sir. I am well aware of the damage that endocrine disrupting chemicals are having, but never considered that feminism is downstream from that fact. This really does explain so many phenomenon you see out in public these days, the rise of LGBTQ, obesity, #girlboss, etc etc
Very interesting observations you’ve made, good theory too. I wonder if this is a pattern worldwide or just in USA? I feel this country has been engineered in sinister and evil ways to be a giant experiment.
I tend to believe that America is at the bleeding edge of this stuff. Obesity is a good example. So I think it’s penetrating worldwide now. But some more traditional cultures are less effected. Overall, the poisons of the modern world are all pervasive but in some places less so than others. Sometimes this is due to wise regulation, cultural practices, and many other factors.
I generally try to let the comments play out. But I just had to nuke many comments from orbit. For all who want to comment please observe this quote from the article:
> no matter how many basement dwelling boys and fame-seeking women opine on our modern ideologies.
If you are an unsenouled man or woman, just stick to facebook. I am insulted that you even read me.
Xenoestrogens are indeed a problem, but they don’t “cause” homosexuality any more than a lack induces heterosexuality.
But you’re on a good track. You should examine what artificial estrogens really do, and when it started.
First, they induce epiphyseal closure of the long bones. Excess estrogen will induce premature closure, and you will see people not attaining genetically appropriate height.
Here’s where to start. Note the sections on anthropometry, and there are three (actually 4) characteristics points of growth - 9 weeks to birth, infancy, 6-8, then adolescence. There’s a surprise in wait on what estrogen does in adolescence.
Second, a bit harsher, is examine men’s penises. Hard to do but I’ve been at it for 5 decades. The tallest men in the world - the Dutch - also have the biggest cocks, porn surprise size cocks. Could height and cock be correlated? Indeed, the length from the meatus (tip) is to the anus is shorter in babies exposed to xenoestrogens in utero, look for studies involving pthalates and a condition called “hypospadas”. It’s a condition where the exit of the urethra is under the head of the penis, and the penis is malformed
It’s gone up dramatically since the 70’s - around when the US switched from glass bottles to plastics. Don’t forget Atrazine! Forbidden in Holland.
Then the third is easier. Fat cells have estrogen receptors involved in how fat is stored. Americans are staggeringly obese, and it also began in the 70’s. The Dutch? Skinny.
There are so many charts on obesity it will be easy to find.
Lastly, 80% of breast cancers are sensitive to estrogen - it accelerates cancer. You’ll not be surprised to find that breast cancers - particularly younger women have been rising dramatically since the 70’s
So I call it Length, Width, Height, Tumor
Smaller cocks, heavier bodies, shorter, and more tumors
Right. But uhm… gay is used in this article as a pejorative and general descriptor for non-ideal males and females. That seems to have been totally clear to everyone but you, perhaps due to your fascination with your own malady. I believe I even mention in the article that it is not concerned with genuine homosexuality. Enjoy your research though. Seems to make you happy.
You are not interested in specifically what you write about - sort of negative masturbation - but you can tell that I totally ignored the body of your writing but not why. I wonder what else you can glean from text.
Don’t see how any endocrine disruptor can increase testosterone for anyone. They’re all estrogenic, which is bad for women too. It’s like having low level birth control in the water and increases cancer rates.
As a man over 40 who works in the sun all day, ZnO sunscreen is your friend, include your neck FTW.
I didn’t see any references in your article and a quick search showed lowering or no change in t levels for women as I remember, which is what you’d expect from first principles. BPA mimics estrogen and binds to the receptor so would have no mechanism to actually increase testosterone.
Increased testosterone in women leads to facial hair growth, enlarged clitoris, & deeper voice to name a few effects.
>Whereas in women these endocrine disruptors increase their androgenic hormones like testosterone and lower their essential feminine hormones like estrogen and progesterone.
There are now hundreds if not thousands of studies showing that endocrine disruptors of all sorts are increasing androgenicity in women. The bisphenol one I mentioned in earlier reply is just one such example.
The whole point of the article is that it’s having a paradoxical effect in chicks. Just because something mimics estrogen doesn’t mean it only has estrogenic effects. Indeed this misunderstanding stems from the belief that estrogen is the tamale hormone which it is not, it is better described as one of the stress hormones (I kept it in the women’s section just to draft of the common misperception).
Our position world does different things in men vs. women. This is not up for debate.
Anyway. Enough on this. I only felt compelled to reply in case others are confused in a similar fashion to you.
Good column sir. I am well aware of the damage that endocrine disrupting chemicals are having, but never considered that feminism is downstream from that fact. This really does explain so many phenomenon you see out in public these days, the rise of LGBTQ, obesity, #girlboss, etc etc
Very interesting observations you’ve made, good theory too. I wonder if this is a pattern worldwide or just in USA? I feel this country has been engineered in sinister and evil ways to be a giant experiment.
Thank you very much.
I tend to believe that America is at the bleeding edge of this stuff. Obesity is a good example. So I think it’s penetrating worldwide now. But some more traditional cultures are less effected. Overall, the poisons of the modern world are all pervasive but in some places less so than others. Sometimes this is due to wise regulation, cultural practices, and many other factors.
We're on a very similar wave length.
Phenomenal. Loved this.
Thank you very much
I generally try to let the comments play out. But I just had to nuke many comments from orbit. For all who want to comment please observe this quote from the article:
> no matter how many basement dwelling boys and fame-seeking women opine on our modern ideologies.
If you are an unsenouled man or woman, just stick to facebook. I am insulted that you even read me.
Xenoestrogens are indeed a problem, but they don’t “cause” homosexuality any more than a lack induces heterosexuality.
But you’re on a good track. You should examine what artificial estrogens really do, and when it started.
First, they induce epiphyseal closure of the long bones. Excess estrogen will induce premature closure, and you will see people not attaining genetically appropriate height.
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2004/04/05/the-height-gap
Here’s where to start. Note the sections on anthropometry, and there are three (actually 4) characteristics points of growth - 9 weeks to birth, infancy, 6-8, then adolescence. There’s a surprise in wait on what estrogen does in adolescence.
Second, a bit harsher, is examine men’s penises. Hard to do but I’ve been at it for 5 decades. The tallest men in the world - the Dutch - also have the biggest cocks, porn surprise size cocks. Could height and cock be correlated? Indeed, the length from the meatus (tip) is to the anus is shorter in babies exposed to xenoestrogens in utero, look for studies involving pthalates and a condition called “hypospadas”. It’s a condition where the exit of the urethra is under the head of the penis, and the penis is malformed
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypospadias
It’s gone up dramatically since the 70’s - around when the US switched from glass bottles to plastics. Don’t forget Atrazine! Forbidden in Holland.
Then the third is easier. Fat cells have estrogen receptors involved in how fat is stored. Americans are staggeringly obese, and it also began in the 70’s. The Dutch? Skinny.
There are so many charts on obesity it will be easy to find.
Lastly, 80% of breast cancers are sensitive to estrogen - it accelerates cancer. You’ll not be surprised to find that breast cancers - particularly younger women have been rising dramatically since the 70’s
So I call it Length, Width, Height, Tumor
Smaller cocks, heavier bodies, shorter, and more tumors
Those are all measurable correlations.
Enjoy.
That
Right. But uhm… gay is used in this article as a pejorative and general descriptor for non-ideal males and females. That seems to have been totally clear to everyone but you, perhaps due to your fascination with your own malady. I believe I even mention in the article that it is not concerned with genuine homosexuality. Enjoy your research though. Seems to make you happy.
You are not interested in specifically what you write about - sort of negative masturbation - but you can tell that I totally ignored the body of your writing but not why. I wonder what else you can glean from text.
Fascinating.
Soooooo What hormones do we need to take to reverse this?
If hormones cause it — then hormones change it
Best you can do is remove the offending toxins & get your blood levels checked. Healthy hormone levels need to be left alone.
Don’t see how any endocrine disruptor can increase testosterone for anyone. They’re all estrogenic, which is bad for women too. It’s like having low level birth control in the water and increases cancer rates.
As a man over 40 who works in the sun all day, ZnO sunscreen is your friend, include your neck FTW.
> Don’t see how any endocrine disruptor can increase testosterone for anyone.
Well, it’s the entire premise for the article. Not sure you fully comprehend the article if that’s your takeaway.
For example. Increased BPA exposure correlates with raised T in women. Many such cases / studies available to the curious researcher.
I didn’t see any references in your article and a quick search showed lowering or no change in t levels for women as I remember, which is what you’d expect from first principles. BPA mimics estrogen and binds to the receptor so would have no mechanism to actually increase testosterone.
Increased testosterone in women leads to facial hair growth, enlarged clitoris, & deeper voice to name a few effects.
In the article:
>Whereas in women these endocrine disruptors increase their androgenic hormones like testosterone and lower their essential feminine hormones like estrogen and progesterone.
There are now hundreds if not thousands of studies showing that endocrine disruptors of all sorts are increasing androgenicity in women. The bisphenol one I mentioned in earlier reply is just one such example.
The whole point of the article is that it’s having a paradoxical effect in chicks. Just because something mimics estrogen doesn’t mean it only has estrogenic effects. Indeed this misunderstanding stems from the belief that estrogen is the tamale hormone which it is not, it is better described as one of the stress hormones (I kept it in the women’s section just to draft of the common misperception).
Our position world does different things in men vs. women. This is not up for debate.
Anyway. Enough on this. I only felt compelled to reply in case others are confused in a similar fashion to you.